In
the
previous posting on this subject, we looked at the idea of money, notably
the definition used by Louis O. Kelso.
Today we want to look at how people think the banking system operates as
opposed to the way it actually does operate.
Virtually
all economics and finance textbooks these days give the same story as to how
fractional reserve banking allegedly functions.
We can do this best by example, as trying to explain it otherwise gets
into very deep quicksand very quickly.
This is because in our opinion the system doesn’t actually work the way described,
which means the explanation naturally isn’t going to make any sense.
Let us reemphasize that point: THIS IS THE WAY ECONOMISTS AND OTHER EXPERTS THINK THE SYSTEM WORKS AND IT IS WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let us reemphasize that point: THIS IS THE WAY ECONOMISTS AND OTHER EXPERTS THINK THE SYSTEM WORKS AND IT IS WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is absolutely, 100% WRONG!!!! |
Here
goes. We assume there is a 10% reserve
requirement for commercial banks and all the banks in the example are
commercial banks.
·
Customer
A deposits Check 1 for $100,000 in Bank X.
This increases Bank X’s reserves by $100,000, of which they hold back
10% or $10,000 and lend out $90,000 to Customer B by giving him Check 2.
·
Customer
B deposits Check 2 for $90,000 in Bank Y.
This increases Bank Y’s reserves by $90,000, of which they hold back 10%
or $9,000 and lend out $81,000 to Customer C by giving him Check 3.
·
Customer
C deposits Check 3 for $81,000 in Bank Z.
This increases Bank Z’s reserves by $81,000, of which they hold back 10%
or $8,100 and lend out $72,900 to Customer D by giving him Check 4.
And
so on, until no more loans can be made.
Eventually the $100,000 Customer A injected into the system is multiplied
to ten times the original amount.
Popular image of your friendly neighborhood banker |
No,
first Bank Y takes Check 2 and presents it to Bank X for payment. Bank X takes $90,000 out of its reserves and
hands the cash over to Bank Y. This
increases Bank Y’s reserves by $90,000 and at the same time decreases Bank X’s
reserves by the same amount.
The
net effect on the amount of money in the economy is zero. Zip.
Zilch. There is no increase in
the money supply, as all that has been accomplished is to transfer funds,
regardless how many loans were made and how many banks were involved.
Obviously,
that is not the way the system works.
The real story is much different.
Henry Thornton: banks create money by accepting bills |
Let
us assume that the reserve requirement is 10% and Customer A deposits $100,000
in a time deposit (savings account).
This is essential because it is illegal to lend money out of a demand deposit
(checking account). A’s deposit increases
the bank’s reserves by $100,000.
The
bank does not lend out A’s $100,000. It
would only do that if it were a bank of deposit, and it is a commercial bank. Instead, the bank creates new money by “accepting”
bills of exchange from businesses with good credit ratings who are reasonably
expected to repay the money.
The
bank cannot just create money at will, however.
First, it can only create up to $1 million because there is a 10%
reserve requirement.
Second,
the bank can’t just create money because it wants to make a loan. Commercial banks do not create money to loan,
but by making loans. If someone does not
present a “creditworthy” loan proposal to the bank, the bank cannot create
money in any amount.
So
how does a commercial bank create money?
First,
someone brings a “real bill” to the bank.
A “real bill” is a bill of exchange that has “real” value, i.e.,
is worth something because the individual or business that issued the bill has
good credit and is expected to deliver cash to redeem the bill in full at
maturity, traditionally 90 days, one quarter of a financial year.
If
the bank believes the bill to be good, it will purchase the bill at a
discount. The discount on a bill of
exchange is not interest. Many finance
books call it “imputed interest,” but that is incorrect. Interest can only properly be charged on a
loan of existing money, and no money exists yet. By accepting a bill, a bank has only started
the process of money creation.
It
is when the bank issues a promissory note and the promissory note is signed by
the borrower (the one who is selling his bill to the bank) that money has been
created. It is not yet in usable (spendable)
form, but it is almost there.
The
bank uses the promissory note to create a new demand deposit in the name of the
borrower, who can now spend the money.
But
what about the cash? What if the
borrower buys something for his project and the one he bought it from brings
the check to the bank and says, “I want to cash this check drawn on your bank.” All the bank has to back the check is the
bill of exchange and the promissory note, neither of which is of any use to the
one cashing the check.
That
is where cash reserves come in. Bank
reserves are funds held in cash at a commercial bank (“vault cash”) or on
deposit by a commercial bank at a central bank to cover transactions demand for
cash, primarily any obligations of the bank that are presented for payment.
Because it is unlikely that all of a bank’s obligations
will be presented for payment at one time, a bank need not hold all of its financial
assets in cash at the bank or on deposit at the central bank (a check drawn on
which being legally the same as cash), and may keep an amount equal to a
fraction of its outstanding obligations in the form of cash or on deposit at
the central bank — the reserve requirement.
Thus, commercial banks typically do not make loans out of
reserves, but use reserves to cover any obligations not presented by the
original borrower. This, however,
creates a few problems, which we will cover in the next posting on this
subject.
#30#